Schedule 1: Service Schedule
Definitions of Services & Reporting Deliverables
This Schedule defines the reporting deliverables provided by Already Doing It Ltd. Every partner receives the same core deliverable: one Impact Report and an accompanying dashboard, generated by a single reporting engine and configured to the partner's programme.
The report is the same in structure, quality and core sections for every partner. A larger programme naturally reflects more activity, because more sessions, schools and data sit behind it, and the highest tier may additionally surface opted-in benchmarking intelligence (section 4). This is the same report reflecting more activity and, where taken, an opted-in section. It is not a different or lesser report for anyone.
All reporting is provided in anonymised, aggregate form, except for pupil-level results that a school is entitled to receive about its own pupils. The partner's tier, funded pool size, number of nominated Insiders and any opted-in intelligence are set out in the signed Order Form, not in this Schedule.
ADI generates a single Impact Report, configured to each partner so that the partner sees the sections relevant to its programme. Across partner types, the report can include:
- Engagement and reach: sessions delivered and schools reached.
- Decision shift: how the conversations moved students, including, for universities, the change in how likely students are to apply.
- What students valued, and the quality of the conversations.
- Discussion topics and the post-18 pathway split.
- Widening-participation reach: first-in-family, free school meals or Pupil Premium, and area-based participation, in aggregate.
- Perception intelligence: what appealed to students and what they wanted to know more about, anonymised to year group.
- Subject and course demand.
- Application outcomes, where students consented, confirmed by the partner school after the UCAS cycle and shown only as a suppressed aggregate.
- Gatsby Benchmark and Compass Plus evidence (for schools): evidence mapped to Benchmarks 2, 3 and 7, and Benchmark 5 where students met graduate Insiders in employment.
Which of these sections a partner sees is a matter of configuration, set out in the Order Form (see section 3).
In addition to the Impact Report, the partnership includes an online dashboard presenting the same metrics on demand, drawn from the same data, with the same anonymisation and small-number suppression applied. Access to the dashboard is provided as part of the partnership.
The Impact Report and dashboard are one deliverable, configured to the partner. A partner sees only the sections it is set up to see. Typical configurations are:
Its own pupils' outcomes, aggregate perception, and Gatsby and Compass Plus evidence.
The same as a school, rolled up across its schools with a per-school breakdown, at trust level.
Decision or apply-likelihood shift, demographic reach, perception intelligence, Access and Participation Plan evidence, and its own conversion. The benchmarking intelligence in section 4 is a higher-tier opt-in.
The widening-participation view across all of its schools, impartial and aggregate, with the conversion panel switched off, because surfacing it would not fit the partnership's impartial remit.
These differences are a matter of configuration, set out in the Order Form, not separate products.
Sector benchmarking, including head-to-head comparison (which institution students chose when they could have chosen another, broken down by school, region and background), is a separate market-intelligence product. It is offered only by separate opt-in arrangement and is not part of the standard deliverable above. It is always aggregated and anonymised, requires its own explicit consent, and is never used to confront a partner with its own losses. It is available only at higher tiers and only where separately agreed in the Order Form.
A partner's own conversion and perception data is part of its programme. The head-to-head comparison is a distinct, opt-in product, governed by its own terms and consent.
